
Note: again, the above page links in the pull-down menu are for your convenience to find specific aspects of the assignment as you work on your essay. However, I suggest you read through the entire page first, to get a good overview of what you're to do. Furthermore, I imbed mini-lectures throughout the page. I want you to learn from and reflect upon the assignment page, not just find out what you need to do.
Here's a snippet from Steely Dan's "Everyone's Gone to the Movies," this assignment's theme song.
Over the number of years that I have taught writing, I've had many students express a distaste for an assigned topic. They wanted to write about whatever they chose, finding an assigned topic limiting. And they're right. It is limiting. But--get used to it. You will find lots of times when you will have writing assignments--both in college and in the business/professional world--where you will have to write whatever is assigned to you.
"Explain the value of content analysis in media research."
"Interview the new hires here at Krogers and write an article introducing them to the store employees."
"How important was the influence of the Civil War on Walt Whitman's poetry? Discuss with specific analysis of at least three Whitman pieces."
"Study the cost overruns in your department for the last six months and write a proposal for reducing them."
So you have to deal with assigned topics, but you don't have to look at them as mere drudgery. You can make them work for you.
Toby Fulwiler, in The Working Writer, includes a brief discussion about the value of owning an assignment:
To understand and take seriously assignments given by other people, you need to do more than merely react to them. You need to make them your own. One way of owning an assignment is to figure out how doing the assignment benefits you in some way--answers a nagging question, is fun or challenging, helps somebody you care about. Another way of owning an assignment is to break it down to a manageable size so you can handle it with the information and time available. In addition, you may also find a way of doing the assignment that's original and creative--an approach more likely than not to spark interest in your reader. (38)
In other words, the key is to find an angle, a perspective, an approach that is in some way connected to your interests, your experience and your worldview so that you can infuse value into the work. That way, you will learn from the work, and you will more likely find a way to make it interesting and insightful for us, your audience.
Moving on, with this essay, we are going to focus upon something we've all had experience with in popular culture: movies and television. So based on our readings found in Angel>Resources>Course Resources>TV/movie articles for essay 3, I'd like you to develop a discussion where you set out to give us insight concerning some aspect of television and/or movies.
And you must use
Note that you have
|
Come up with a question that you would like to explore, something that you wonder about, and through which your reading and writing can ultimately bring us insight into the world of TV and/or movies. Here are a couple of examples of ways to approach the subject:
- But how persuasive is the evidence? Choose one alleged problem that arises from TV viewing or video game playing and explore the reasons that some assert such is so.
Do you see the problem arising in your life, or among those around you, whether family or friends?
And does the research show causation or does it show correlation? In other words does playing violent video games cause aggression, or is it that aggressive children and teens are drawn to violent games? Just because to activities or situations exist side by side (correlation) does not mean that one causes the other (causation).
- Be careful--do not try to cover all Americans, or even all teenagers. Keep your focus on a smaller population like preteen boys or twentysomething women. And try focusing on a specific type of programming or video game.
Other
researchers, such as Leonard Eron and George Gerbner (see the
transcripts to the Frontline documentary "Does TV Kill?"),
make powerful assertions about how movies and TV have affected us detrimentally--making us
more violent, sexually irresponsible, racist, misogynistic and fearful.However, Sydney Pollack also presents an effective position by asserting that movies only reflect the values and attitudes that already exist in our society.
- Which of these writers/researchers do you find more evident in those around you?
- Do movies and TV primarily reflect our values or do they shape the values of the audience?
I realize that some of you might want to assert that movies and TV do both.
Doing so is fine, but which is more so?
- Reflect or shape?
- And--I suggest you focus on one specific value or attitude, such as body image or sexual behavior, among a specific population, like preteen girls, or college-age men. Also, plan to focus on a specific TV show or movie.
Now note, these are sample questions and suggestions
to help you discover what
you find most fruitful for a paper.
Instead, focus upon a thesis statement that expresses something significant, interesting or curious about a specific aspect of TV/movies.
And again, make sure that you narrow your focus upon a small enough aspect of your topic so that you end up with a fully developed discussion for a 800-1000 word paper. Review Part 3 of the virtual lecture on Academic Essays. |
We, the members of this class, are your audience. As I mentioned above, your goal is to provide us insight about some aspect of TV or movies.
To do so, you need to persuade us that your point of view is credible and interesting.
- For example, if you notice a class member saying that the Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess is a really enjoyable game, how effectively will you communicate to him or her if you state that only a baby would play on a Nintendo video game system?
Of course this doesn't mean you can't disagree with each other. Doing so is inevitable.
But doing so respectfully will get your audience to consider you position valid and worth listening to even if they disagree.
- If you can show us expertise--
- by sharing an anecdote about TV viewing in your family or
- by showing us the extensive skills needed to be a successful video game player--
- then we are more likely to consider your point valid.
- And more likely to consider it interesting.
- Again, review part 3 of the virtual lecture on academic essays about developing paragraphs.
However, you do need to avoid the logical fallacy hasty generalization. In other words, just because something happened to members of your family or friends doesn't make it so, necessarily, for the rest of our society.
- In other words, just because Uncle Buford roams the countryside yelling "They're hear, watch out for giant pods" after watching Invasion of the Body Snatchers doesn't mean most viewers are influenced the same way.
See the next two points to help broaden your evidence.
- If you find
an informative discussion in a magazine article about the positive values expressed in reality shows,
a fact from a credible web page (more on this later) about the average number of hours that teenagers watch TV, or
- a relevant quotation from a newspaper about how movies reflect our society's mores about sex,
- you bring in other voices to your discussion that may enrich you position.
Note again, that you have access to a reference librarian online and in the library who would delight in helping you. Click here for more information.
- We've read together three articles on TV and movies. You would do well to use one or more of the articles we've read together.
- Think of the authors we read as other voices that participate in the conversation about the topic you are giving us insight into, voices that you spring off in agreement, disagreement, qualification and such.
- Doing so broadens your credibility, shows us that your point of view is based not only on your perceptive observations, but also on your consideration of a community of writers and thinkers in our broader society.
- Plus using articles we've read together places your topic into a context that we are familiar with and can give us more insight into your point of view.
- And as I noted above, you don't necessarily have to agree with those we read (or that you read in other articles you come upon in your research).
But you do need to disagree respectfully, as you would with one of us.
Just remember that some in your audience may agree with the position you disagree with. If you insult the author, you may be insulting your audience, who may then disregard what you are asserting.
So, again, you would do well to use support from one or more of the selections we've read together.
- Just remember that if you make a point that could be supported by our reading and you don't, your discussion will be less effective for us.
Also, make sure that when you do quote or paraphrase from someone you put the page number in parenthesis. See PSM 119+.
I would suggest you consider these questions some time during the
process of working through your essay:
|
Therefore based on the discussion above, this essay should include as support for your discussion the following:
- And the minimum number to use is three.
Also, make sure that when you do quote or paraphrase from someone you put the page number, or paragraph number if an online source, in parenthesis. See PSM 119+.
And include a works cited page that presents the sources you use, whether from Resources or elsewhere.
This paper is also to be
800-1000 words in length,
formatted with MLA style guidelines (PSM 148-52) and sample in Course Files>Samples from Dan and
- in RTF format.
And again it needs to include a works cited page for the three or more sources you use.
See the virtual lecture on MLA style, under week 7 of our calendar.
And remember: strive to accomplish the maximum number of words allowed on papers--shorter papers typically are not developed effectively with sufficient detail or with sufficient complexity of thought for a college level audience.
And make sure to keep everything you do in working this paper, including hard copies of the drafts you produce, because I will need to see all of it if you choose the essay for the portfolio.
There are 4.1 steps that need to be completed as described below to receive full credit for this essay.
Due dates:
| Note: time is at a premium even more now than at the beginning of the semester. These last two essays are going to require more because of their need for more research. Therefore, be careful and diligent to meet the deadlines, so that you will have the time necessary for portfolio preparation. Also, I suggest you be diligent to complete the prewriting activities in step 1. Not only will they help you in writing the essay, they will earn significant points--more than in the previous two essays. |
Step 1--prewriting: 10/10/09, Saturday midnight
Step 2--draft: 10/17/09, Saturday midnight
Step 3--audience response: 10/22/09 Thursday midnight.
Step 4--revised draft: 10/24/09, Saturday midnight.
- Step .1--twitter log: 10/24/09, Saturday midnight
| Note: you are eligible to earn credit for essay 3 work and to receive a response from me only if you complete all 4.1 steps. |
Throughout the process of working on essay 3, again, I would like you to keep a log of your research/writing activities on Twitter.
In other words, whenever you're doing something concerning essay 3, post a tweet.
Again, what will be the value of this?
Well, first off, you'll see what other class member are doing--researching, questioning, writing--which might give you some ideas for your work on essay 3.
Also, you will have a list of activities you've done that you can refer to, which may help you if you recall looking at a web page or noted an idea that you want to refer to. And will help with the reflection in step 4.
As I noted with the last essay, work on making your tweets specific. You have 140 characters with each tweet to work with, so try being more descriptive than "is working on essay." Those who tweet frequently, specifically, and insightfully will earn full credit.
Also, for this essay, to earn full credit, you will need to pay attention to what other class members are tweeting. Asking questions of class members and replying to their tweets will add value to our use of the microblog, and earn you more points.
If you need a reminder on setting up Twitter, click here.
Also, you might want to use a Twitter gadget if you use iGoogle or would like to use it in your student gmail.
If you're a frequent Facebook or Myspace user, you can add a widget and follow Twitter.
Another possibility is to use a desktop Twitter reader, like Tweetdeck or Twhirl.
Also--this is important--with each tweet about essay 3, always add the hashtag #121e3 to your message. And what you see in blue should be typed exactly as presented--including the number sign (#).
(Note: again, please send as one file through the prewriting drop box at
Pages & Workspaces>Week 7 and do not send through the chat notes drop box.)By 10/10/09, Saturday midnight, send me, as one RTF file, some prewriting--note there are five things to submit--three invention techniques, bookmark URL, and a working thesis. And make sure to label each clearly.
As I noted last time, this invention technique, also known as list making, is a way to throw down as many things as you can think of concerning your topic. In other words, making a list of words or phrases as quickly as possible. Doing so will often help you gather a good number of examples, ideas, snippets of details that you might not think of just by sitting down and writing.
So what I'd like you to do is to make a list about television and movies—TV shows, commercials, jingles, actors, scenes, snippets of dialogue, benefits, problems, ideas, examples—anything that comes to mind.
I'll expect to see a minimum of 30 items. At least 40 or more to earn full credit.
Here's what I would like you to freewrite about:
Movies or TV programs you remember from childhood
- What do you remember watching?
- Where?
- How?—TV, VCR, DVD, theater, drive-in? Video games?
- Any visual images that really stuck with you from childhood? Any images that scared you from TV or movies?
- What’s the first TV show or movie you remember viewing?
Freewrite, non-stop, for ten minutes focusing on this prompt.
The more sources you can find the better, but bookmark at least eight sources for your prewriting.
Note: I suggest you use Diigo. If you already have a delicious account, feel free to use it.
Click here for directions on using Diigo.
Send me the URL to your bookmarks. It should be http://www.diigo.com/user/your username. For example, mine is http://www.diigo.com/user/danholt. That way, I'll be able to look at your bookmarks to give you credit for your work.
Again note: Prewriting is not a
draft of your essay. It's the initial thinking out loud on paper, a list of
details, answering initial questions, mapping, outlining, a pile of stuff from which you
will pick, choose and shape.
The draft is what you write after doing prewriting, you first attempt at shaping your thoughts into a unified, focused and narrower expression. |
Again, make sure to keep everything you do in working this paper, including hard copies of the drafts you produce, because I will want to see all of it if you choose the essay for the portfolio.
By 10/17/09, Saturday midnight, you need to submit drafts of your paper in two places.
The workshops will be available by Thursday, 10/15/09.
You can get to the Writer's Workshop either through the week 8 folder or under the Communication tab.
- This draft can be pasted into the Message box or attached as an RTF file.
- And this draft should be as complete as possible--with a beginning, middle, end--though it doesn't need to be pretty or perfect. Just posting an outline or a paragraph or two will give your batch partners little to work with and will elicit much weaker feedback than with a fully formed draft. And you will lose significant points.
Here's how you post the audio version of your draft:
Go to Week 8>Writer's Workshop, voice.
With the first time you open Wimba, scroll down to the bottom and click on Setup Wizard. A new window should pop up. Follow the directions to test your computer. If everything works, go back to the window with the Authentication screen.
- On the Authentication pop-up,
- next to Screen name, type in your name (first and last). Ignore Login and Password
- Click on New.
Title the file with the title of your essay.
Then click on the large dot, when you're ready to record your reading.
Click on the square when you're done, and then Send.
- Record separate files for each two pages (double spaced) of your essay.
Note: it is very important to keep the deadline for posting drafts. Otherwise class members will have a difficult time doing the next step. And you stand the chance of not getting sufficient feedback. Though do note you have the 24 hour grace period to work with--in other words, your drafts can be posted by Sunday midnight with no penalty.
By 10/22/09, Thursday midnight, read class members' papers and post responses to the writers in the Writer's Workshop. I'll have a link on the calendar by 5 p.m. Monday, 10/19/09 for further instructions.
Finally, by 10/24/09, Saturday midnight, send a revised draft of Essay 3 in RTF format through the essay drop box in Angel.
Include the Reflection on Essay 3, instructions for which will be available Friday by 5:00 p.m., 10/23/09 attached to the calendar.Another reminder that you have available the LCC Writing Center.
You can work with someone online or f2f in the Writing Center in room 251 of the Arts & Sciences Building. Their phone number is 383-1907, and you can find the open hours at http://www.lcc.edu/lsd/writingcenter/. Best to make an appointment.
If you have any questions, don't hesitate to call me or e-mail me. My phone number and office hours are right above the Table of Contents on the Online Syllabus. I do have voice mail for my phone if I'm not in.
[Calendar] [Syllabus] [Angel] [Chat schedule] [What's New]
[Introduction] [Topic questions] [Remember your audience] [Using sources] [Requirements] [Due Dates] [Twitter] [Prewriting] [Drafts] [Audience response] [Revised draft] [Reflection]
Created by Dan Holt 10/20/1997
Revised
06 Oct 2009 03:41 PM -0400